![]() I don't care how much of an 'industry standard' they are anymore. If this actually goes through, I'm done with Adobe. The competitors do this in their cloud apps, so there's no reason Adobe can't, especially for the ridiculous prices they charge. OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox, etc.), even though they can easily do that. And they purposely don't allow users to use their local storage or hook in their cloud storage of choice (e.g. They know that users will need more storage since RAW files are huge, so it's basically going to be 9.99 USD + ANOTHER 9.99 USD to add 1 TB. If you notice in their updated Lightroom plan, they removed Lightroom Classic (taking away any ability to work on your local storage) and only offer a measly 20GB of slow-ass syncing. Microsoft is a great example of this with Office 365, and you get 1TB per user in addition to other goodies. Most companies who do subscription models offer a reasonable monthly cost (even lower if you commit annually), to entice users to stick with them for the long-run while being able to innovate and update their apps faster while making a profit. But what do you think?įor now, everyone can still find the standard Photography plan for the original pricing at B&H. But actually changing pricing by hiding a plan for a vast number of customers is a pretty drastic way to run market tests. This is all a big what-if scenario, granted. Those that rely on being able to stop a subscription and restart it during varying work cycles would also be hurt by not being able to keep a more affordable plan. Of course, this could mean the worst could be coming, as someone has to ask why someone would run such a test. If these tests are successful in that more than half of the percentage of people that only see the $19.99 Photography plan still end up going through with that purchase compared to the percentage of people that see both plans, Adobe will have good reason to get rid of the more affordable plan altogether. While Adobe may grandfather in current subscribers as many companies do when there are subscription price increases and changing plans, anyone new to photography would face paying twice as much as we all did when we started. ![]() Rarely do companies actually remove more affordable, better plans from many customers' views while leaving it up for others as a test. But it might not feel right to some who would unknowingly purchase more than they needed to. It is understandable that a company might want to run tests for various design, interface, and marketing elements and how this is all displayed on a website. This continues for many users that view all plans as part of tests Adobe is running in a way that for some seems linked to the Internet browser they're using. Notice how Adobe's current wording on the bottom shows only the $19.99 starting price. After all, this is what's currently happening on Adobe's website. Even then, who is to say Adobe may not be running tests through their phone sales as well, where they would tell some people and potentially not others. They would have to either shop elsewhere or specifically call in and ask if there just happens to be a more affordable plan available for purchase. new customers) would almost certainly not know about the original Photography plan for $9.99 when it's not presented on the page. While it may be the case that it's still available, unsuspecting users (i.e. The plan can be purchased at, via phone at 1-80 or via major retailers." We are currently running a number of tests on. Some users can apparently still see the original plan, and Adobe has now commented about the more affordable Photography plan:įrom time to time, we run tests on which cover a range of items, including plan options that may or may not be presented to all visitors to. And now, $10 only gets you Lightroom with 1 TB of storage, but leaves out Photoshop entirely. This is incredibly unfortunate, especially considering many users simply do not need or want any cloud storage space to begin with. for the 1 TB plan, since the 20 GB cloud storage plan is gone. Recently, some users have noticed Adobe is not displaying all of the available Photography plans, which means if you want both Photoshop and Lightroom, you're going to have to pay $19.99/mo. But for photographers, plans like the Photography plan seemed reasonable enough to go along with it. When Adobe switched to a subscription-only model, many creatives felt it was asking too much. But it's that first Photography plan that many, many photographers (myself included) are huge fans of. The Lightroom plan is Lightroom-only for $9.99. Adobe's current lineup of photography-related plans includes the Photography plan and the Lightroom plan, where the Photography plan comes with Lightroom, Photoshop, and options for 20 GB of cloud storage ($9.99/mo.) or 1 TB of cloud storage ($19.99/mo.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |